\n\n{% include \"_header.html\" %}\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Signage Admin
\n\n {% if error %}\n
\n {{ error }}\n
\n {% endif %}\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n{% include \"_footer.html\" %}\n
\n\n"
}
```
@@ -1206,1339 +147,244 @@ Wrote file successfully.
---
-## Assistant (Build · DeepSeek V4 Flash Free · 3.2s)
-
-_Thinking:_
-
-Done. Let me tell the user the file was created.
-
-`opencode.md` erstellt – deckt Installation, Tastenkürzel, Befehle, Plan-/Build-Mode und AGENTS.md ab.
-
----
-
-## User
-
-wie würde für die user authentifizierung eine Anbindung mit keycloak aussehen, geht das?
-
----
-
-## Assistant (Plan · GPT-5.4 Mini · 4.1s)
-
----
-
-## User
-
-wie würde für die user authentifizierung eine Anbindung mit keycloak aussehen, geht das?
-
----
-
-## Assistant (Plan · DeepSeek V4 Flash Free · 19.6s)
-
-_Thinking:_
-
-The user is asking about integrating Keycloak for user authentication instead of the current `users.json`-based approach. They want to know if it's possible and how it would look. Since I'm in Plan Mode, I should research and plan without making any changes.
-
-Let me think about this:
-
-Current authentication:
-- `users.json` with werkzeug.security scrypt hashed passwords
-- Three roles: admin, superuser, user
-- Login via email + password
-- Session-based auth with Flask session cookies
-- Decorators: `@login_required`, `@admin_required`, `@site_access_required`
-- Per-user site access control
-
-Keycloak integration would mean:
-1. Replace the local user database with Keycloak as OIDC/OAuth2 provider
-2. Users authenticate via Keycloak login page (redirect)
-3. Roles/mappings from Keycloak control access in the app
-4. Flask session still used but with tokens from Keycloak
-
-Possible approaches:
-1. **Flask-OIDC / flask-oidc** - Simple OIDC middleware
-2. **Authlib** - More flexible OAuth/OIDC library
-3. **Keycloak-specific: python-keycloak** - Direct Keycloak REST API integration
-4. **Flask + OIDC via `flask-praetorian`** or similar
-
-Key considerations:
-- The app has multiple decorators (`@login_required`, `@admin_required`, `@site_access_required`)
-- Role mapping from Keycloak (realm roles, client roles, or custom attributes)
-- Site access would need to come from Keycloak attributes or stay in a local mapping
-- Sessions need to remain (can't have stateless JWT on every request easily with server-rendered templates)
-- The current `current_user` object pattern would need to be replaced or adapted
-
-Let me think about a concrete plan:
-
-1. Install `flask-oidc` or `authlib` for OIDC/OAuth2
-2. Configure Keycloak client (confidential client with client secret)
-3. Add Keycloak config to `config.json`
-4. Replace `load_users()` / `save_users()` with Keycloak user lookup
-5. Adapt `User` class to work with Keycloak data
-6. Replace login/logout routes with OIDC flow
-7. Map Keycloak roles to app roles (admin, superuser, user)
-8. Site access: could be custom attributes in Keycloak or stay in a local file
-
-Let me outline the plan clearly.
-
-Actually, the user asked "geht das?" - yes it's definitely possible. Let me outline how.
-
-Ja, das geht. Hier eine Übersicht, wie eine Keycloak-Anbindung aussehen würde:
-
-## Ansatz: OIDC (OpenID Connect) mit Flask
-
-**Empfohlene Library:** `authlib` (flask-oidc ist veraltet)
-
-### 1. Keycloak-Konfiguration
-
-- Client anlegen (Confidential, Access Type: confidential)
-- Standard-Fluss: Authorization Code
-- Roles in Keycloak: `admin`, `superuser`, `user` (Client-Roles oder Realm-Roles)
-- Site-Zugriff als **Custom User Attribute** in Keycloak (z. B. `sites = stuttgart,karlsruhe`)
-
-### 2. Änderungen in `config.json`
-
-```json
-{
- "keycloak": {
- "server_url": "https://keycloak.example.com",
- "realm": "signage",
- "client_id": "signage-app",
- "client_secret": "***"
- }
-}
-```
-
-### 3. Anpassungen in `app.py`
-
-```python
-from authlib.integrations.flask_client import OAuth
-
-oauth = OAuth(app)
-keycloak = oauth.register(
- name='keycloak',
- server_metadata_url=f'{keycloak_url}/realms/{realm}/.well-known/openid-configuration',
- client_id=client_id,
- client_secret=client_secret,
- client_kwargs={'scope': 'openid profile email roles'}
-)
-```
-
-**Neue Routen:**
-
-| Route | Beschreibung |
-|-------|-------------|
-| `GET /login` | Redirect zu Keycloak |
-| `GET /callback` | OIDC-Callback (token einholen) |
-| `GET /logout` | Session + Keycloak-Session beenden |
-
-### 4. Ersetzen von `users.json`
-
-- `users.json` entfällt (Single Source of Truth = Keycloak)
-- Site-Zugriff aus Keycloak User Attributes
-- Rollen aus Keycloak Realm/Client-Roles
-- `current_user` wird aus OIDC-Token befüllt
-- `load_users()` / `save_users()` können für lokales Site-Mapping bleiben (optional)
-
-### 5. User-Klasse
-
-```python
-class KeycloakUser:
- def __init__(self, token):
- self.email = token.get('email')
- self.role = self._get_role(token)
- self.sites = self._get_sites(token)
- self.is_admin = self.role == 'admin'
- self.is_superuser = self.role == 'superuser'
- self.is_authenticated = True
-```
-
-### 6. Vorteile
-
-- **Zentrales Identity Management** (ein Account für alle Dienste)
-- **Passwort-Policies, 2FA, Account-Sperre** von Keycloak verwaltet
-- **Kein Passwort-Hashing** in der App
-- **Self-Service** (Passwort vergessen, Profil ändern)
-
-### 7. Nachteile / Hürden
-
-| Hürde | Lösung |
-|-------|--------|
-| Keycloak-Setup nötig | Einmalig aufsetzen (Docker-Image, Realm exportieren) |
-| Zuständigkeit Site-Mapping | Lokal in `config.json` oder als Keycloak-Attribut |
-| Offline-Fallback bei Keycloak-Ausfall | Notfall-Login via `config.json.admin` |
-| User-Verwaltung in Flask-UI | Entfällt → über Keycloak-Admin-Console |
-
-### 8. Optionen für Site-Zugriff
-
-**A) Keycloak User Attribute** (empfohlen):
-```json
-Attribute "sites": ["stuttgart", "karlsruhe"]
-```
-→ Wird im OIDC-Token mitgeliefert, kein lokaler State nötig.
-
-**B) Lokales Mapping** (einfacher, aber doppelte Pflege):
-```json
-"site_mapping": {
- "user@example.com": ["stuttgart"]
-}
-```
-→ `config.json` bleibt zuständig für Site-Zuordnung.
-
----
-
-**Fazit:** Technisch gut machbar (`authlib` + ~50 Zeilen zusätzlicher Code in `app.py`). Die Hauptarbeit ist das Keycloak-Setup und die Migration der existierenden User.
-
-Soll ich einen detaillierten Implementierungsplan mit Code-Skizzen machen?
-
----
-
-## User
-
-kann ich sonst eine MFA Authentification dazu fügen also evtl. auch ohne Keycloak
-
----
-
-## Assistant (Plan · DeepSeek V4 Flash Free · 19.7s)
-
-_Thinking:_
-
-The user wants to know if they can add MFA authentication without Keycloak. Let me think about what approaches are available for a Flask app like this.
-
-Since we're in Plan Mode, I should only research and plan, not make any changes.
-
-Options for MFA in a Flask app without Keycloak:
-
-1. **TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)** - Using libraries like `pyotp` + `qrcode` for setup
-2. **WebAuthn/Passkeys** - Using `webauthn` library for browser-based biometric/security key auth
-3. **Email/SMS OTP** - Send one-time codes via email or SMS
-4. **Duo Security** - Third-party MFA service with Flask integration
-
-Let me think about what's most practical for this codebase:
-
-The current app uses:
-- `users.json` with scrypt password hashes
-- Flask session cookies
-- werkzeug's `check_password_hash` and `generate_password_hash`
-
-The simplest approach would be TOTP (like Google Authenticator, Authy, etc.) since it:
-- Requires no external service
-- No additional cost
-- Works offline
-- Well-established libraries available
-- Easy to integrate with the existing user system
-
-Let me plan this out.
-
-For TOTP:
-- Library: `pyotp` for generating/validating codes, `qrcode` for setup QR codes
-- Per-user: store `otp_secret` in `users.json`
-- New routes:
- - `GET /mfa/setup` - Show QR code to scan
- - `POST /mfa/setup` - Verify first code, enable MFA
- - `POST /mfa/verify` - Verify code during login
- - `POST /mfa/disable` - Disable MFA
-- New template: `mfa_setup.html` - QR code + verification
-- Modified: login flow checks `user.get('mfa_enabled')` and prompts for code
-- Recovery codes: generate 8-10 backup codes on setup
-
-Let me present this clearly to the user.
-
-Ja, ganz ohne Keycloak – einfach **TOTP** (Time-based One-Time Password) direkt in die bestehende Flask-App integrieren.
-
-## Vorschlag: TOTP (Google Authenticator / Authy)
-
-**Libraries:** `pyotp` + `qrcode` (`pip install pyotp qrcode[pil]`)
-
-### Ablauf
-
-```
-Login (E-Mail + Passwort)
- → Passwort korrekt?
- → Nein → Fehler
- → Ja → MFA aktiviert?
- → Nein → eingeloggt
- → Ja → TOTP-Code abfragen → eingeloggt
-```
-
-### Änderungen in `users.json`
-
-Pro User zwei neue Felder:
-```json
-{
- "otp_secret": "JBSWY3DPEHPK3PXP",
- "mfa_enabled": true,
- "recovery_codes": ["ABCD-1234", "EFGH-5678", …]
-}
-```
-
-### Neue Routen
-
-| Route | Beschreibung |
-|-------|-------------|
-| `GET /mfa/setup` | QR-Code anzeigen + Secret (nur eingeloggt) |
-| `POST /mfa/setup` | Ersten Code verifizieren → MFA aktivieren |
-| `POST /mfa/disable` | MFA deaktivieren (mit Passwort-Bestätigung) |
-| `GET /mfa/verify` | TOTP-Code-Eingabe (nach Login) |
-| `POST /mfa/verify` | Code prüfen → Session freischalten |
-
-### Login-Änderung (`POST /login`)
-
-```python
-user = get_user(email)
-if user and check_password_hash(user['password_hash'], password):
- if user.get('mfa_enabled'):
- session['mfa_pending'] = email # Noch nicht voll eingeloggt
- return redirect('/mfa/verify')
- # Normaler Login
- session['user'] = email
-```
-
-### Setup-Seite (`/mfa/setup`)
-
-- Zeigt QR-Code (via `qrcode` als Base64-Data-URI) + manuelles Secret
-- 1x Code-Eingabe zur Verifikation
-- 8 Recovery-Codes (werden nach Aktivierung einmalig angezeigt)
-
-### Code-Skizze Setup
-
-```python
-import pyotp, qrcode, io, base64
-
-@app.route('/mfa/setup', methods=['GET', 'POST'])
-@login_required
-def mfa_setup():
- user = get_user(session['user'])
- secret = user.get('otp_secret') or pyotp.random_base32()
- totp = pyotp.TOTP(secret)
-
- if request.method == 'POST':
- code = request.form['code']
- if totp.verify(code):
- # MFA aktivieren + Recovery-Codes generieren
- users = load_users()
- users[session['user']]['otp_secret'] = secret
- users[session['user']]['mfa_enabled'] = True
- recovery = [secrets.token_hex(3).upper()[:7] for _ in range(8)]
- users[session['user']]['recovery_codes'] = recovery
- save_users(users)
- return render_template('mfa_recovery.html', codes=recovery)
- flash('Code ungültig')
-
- uri = totp.provisioning_uri(session['user'], issuer="CANCOM Signage")
- img = qrcode.make(uri)
- buf = io.BytesIO()
- img.save(buf, format='PNG')
- qr_b64 = base64.b64encode(buf.getvalue()).decode()
-
- return render_template('mfa_setup.html', qr_data=qr_b64, secret=secret)
-```
-
-### Recovery-Codes
-
-- 8 Codes, einmalig nach Aktivierung angezeigt
-- Bei Login: Option "Code verloren?" → Recovery-Code eingeben
-- Nach Nutzung eines Recovery-Codes: MFA deaktivieren (erzwungene Neueinrichtung)
-
-### Aufwand
-
-| Komponente | Zeilen |
-|-----------|--------|
-| `pip install pyotp qrcode[pil]` | 1 |
-| Neue Routen (setup/verify/login-änderung) | ~80 |
-| Templates (`mfa_setup.html`, `mfa_verify.html`) | ~60 |
-| Recovery-Code-Handling | ~20 |
-| **Gesamt** | **~160** |
-
-### Vorteile dieser Lösung
-
-- **Kein externer Dienst** – läuft komplett lokal
-- **Standard-konform** – funktioniert mit jeder Authenticator-App
-- **Einfach rückbaubar** – keine Abhängigkeit von Keycloak
-- **Recovery-Codes** – kein Lockout-Risiko
-- **Bestehendes User-System bleibt** – nur 2 Felder + Recovery-Codes in `users.json`
-
-Soll ich das umsetzen?
-
----
-
-## User
-
-weitere Frage:
-
----
-
-## Assistant (Plan · DeepSeek V4 Flash Free · 2.8s)
-
-_Thinking:_
-
-The user said "weitere Frage:" but didn't actually ask a question yet. They just started a new message. Let me wait for them to ask their question.
-
-Gerne, frag los!
-
----
-
-## User
-
-kann ich den Aktiv Status bei meinen Screens son Anzeigen lassen dass dieser nur dann grün wird, wenn der player auch aktiv ist, das heißt wenn die URL von einem Screen Device aufgerufen wird und die Playlist abgespielt wird
-
----
-
-## Assistant (Plan · DeepSeek V4 Flash Free · 16.1s)
-
-_Thinking:_
-
-The user wants to show an "active status" indicator for screens - green only when the player is actively being used (i.e., when a browser has opened the player URL and is playing the playlist).
-
-This requires some kind of heartbeat mechanism from the player to the server, so the server knows which screens are currently active.
-
-Let me think about how to implement this:
-
-1. **Player-side**: Send a periodic "heartbeat" ping to the server while the page is open
-2. **Server-side**: Track when each screen last received a heartbeat
-3. **Admin UI**: Show a green/red indicator based on recent heartbeat
-
-### Implementation options:
-
-**Option A: Simple heartbeat endpoint**
-- Player sends `GET /heartbeat/